TheLocalYokel
Honorary Member Of Forums4airports
- Jan 14, 2009
- 16,688
- 343
- IMPORTANT!! To reduce spam, we request that you make a post soon after completing your registration. We request you keep your account active by posting regularly. Inactive accounts risk being deleted.
- Yes
- Admin
- #261
https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/File:JD_Cumberland06.jpg
ashton bristol double decker bridge
I've found some old pics of how the Cumberland Basin used to look prior to the flyover system being built in the mid 1960s. The first link is an aerial picture.
The second link is to a series of pictures showing the Ashton Swing Bridge from its inception in the dim, distant past to its new incarnation as part of the MetroBus route. It used to be a double decker bridge - road on top and rail below - and was part of the pre-flyover route out of the city to north Somerset. Traffic left Hotwells via the Junction Lock Swing Bridge (still useful when the main flyover bridge is swing for shipping) towards Ashton Swing Bridge.
Returning to Mayor Rees's proposal/aspiration for demolition, I think the driver is his desire to find space for a multitude of affordable homes, something that is close to his heart.
I'm not convinced of the practicalities of the notion, apart from the expense. He suggests a new crossing nearer the Suspension Bridge. Where would he find the room? The A4 at the Hotwells end is squeezed between buildings that are against the hill with the river on the other side. It does widen a bit on the actual approach to the flyover system but a new bridge would have to have a very steep ramp if it was to cross the river without the need to open to permit tall ships to pass underneath.
So far as traffic concerned wherever the crossing is put is going to do nothing to alleviate the long queues on the A4 Portway and A 370 Long Ashton Bypass which itself receives traffic from the A38 via the South Bristol Link Road. Traffic will still have to home in on this one point from these directions. The disruption caused during demolition and construction would be mind boggling but I accept that in itself is not a reason for doing nothing. To maintain some link with the airport in this thread, airport traffic would be affected.
I've given the idea more thought since it was made public and if there was a possibility of it improving that part of the city including traffic flows then perhaps it might be worth further exploration. However, the mayor has so much on his plate to deal with the many current problems around the city which are made worse with an empty municipal purse that I wish he'd concentrate on that at the moment instead of using scarce money and other resources on what might turn out to be nothing more than a pipe dream.
Bristol's local politicians of all persuasions have a long and inglorious record of talking the talk but too often reneging when it comes to walking the walk, but public money is expended in the process. I fear this will be the latest example.
ashton bristol double decker bridge
I've found some old pics of how the Cumberland Basin used to look prior to the flyover system being built in the mid 1960s. The first link is an aerial picture.
The second link is to a series of pictures showing the Ashton Swing Bridge from its inception in the dim, distant past to its new incarnation as part of the MetroBus route. It used to be a double decker bridge - road on top and rail below - and was part of the pre-flyover route out of the city to north Somerset. Traffic left Hotwells via the Junction Lock Swing Bridge (still useful when the main flyover bridge is swing for shipping) towards Ashton Swing Bridge.
Returning to Mayor Rees's proposal/aspiration for demolition, I think the driver is his desire to find space for a multitude of affordable homes, something that is close to his heart.
I'm not convinced of the practicalities of the notion, apart from the expense. He suggests a new crossing nearer the Suspension Bridge. Where would he find the room? The A4 at the Hotwells end is squeezed between buildings that are against the hill with the river on the other side. It does widen a bit on the actual approach to the flyover system but a new bridge would have to have a very steep ramp if it was to cross the river without the need to open to permit tall ships to pass underneath.
So far as traffic concerned wherever the crossing is put is going to do nothing to alleviate the long queues on the A4 Portway and A 370 Long Ashton Bypass which itself receives traffic from the A38 via the South Bristol Link Road. Traffic will still have to home in on this one point from these directions. The disruption caused during demolition and construction would be mind boggling but I accept that in itself is not a reason for doing nothing. To maintain some link with the airport in this thread, airport traffic would be affected.
I've given the idea more thought since it was made public and if there was a possibility of it improving that part of the city including traffic flows then perhaps it might be worth further exploration. However, the mayor has so much on his plate to deal with the many current problems around the city which are made worse with an empty municipal purse that I wish he'd concentrate on that at the moment instead of using scarce money and other resources on what might turn out to be nothing more than a pipe dream.
Bristol's local politicians of all persuasions have a long and inglorious record of talking the talk but too often reneging when it comes to walking the walk, but public money is expended in the process. I fear this will be the latest example.